The essay “The Plastic Flamingo: A National
History,” written by Jennifer Price, mainly discusses the two factors behind
the popularity of plastic pink flamingo in the fifties by providing various
examples. With critical tone and use of certain diction, it also portrays Price’s
view on United States culture that Americans are showy about wealth and have the
tendency to love yet destroy.
Price
mentions that the flamingo is a symbol of boldness and extravagance. She gives
an example of the Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas that “anyone who has seen Las
Vegas knows that a flamingo stands out in a desert strikingly”. This supports
her idea of American’s showiness because they tried to stress the meaning of
flamingo using as the name of grand hotel. Also, the bright color pink, which
was “a hotter pink than a real flamingo” is another reason for Price’s idea on
U.S. culture because of the stronger and more noticeable
hue of the artificial flamingo emphasizes the symbolic meaning of pink which is
boldness. Just like Elvis Presley who bought a pink Cadillac after signing a
contract for his first recording, the color pink was a color to “celebrate new
affluence.” Since both pink and flamingo were symbolic for wealth, Price viewed
the Americans who made plastic figures of pink flamingos as bragging wealth.
Americans’
manner of loving flamingos induces irony of “love yet destroy.” Stating “This
was a little ironic,” Price presented her critical view of changed attitude of
Americans toward the flamingo, comparing the current situation with a
historical fact. Flamingos were once merely the subject of hunting in 1800s,
while they are se loved by the public that “Americans had been flocking to
Florida and returning home with flamingo souvenirs.” Price shows a negative opinion
about the capricious American culture here.
The
popularity of plastic pink flamingo has reflected the U.S culture in two
aspects-stressing wealth using two symbols of wealth, which are the bright pink
color and the flamingo, as well as having contrasting attitudes of treating the
bird as game in the past but as symbolically special in the present.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기