2013년 10월 20일 일요일

Analytical Essay_AP US History

The most significant results of the War of 1812 were increased patriotism and nationalism among Americans. The Era of Good Feelings was a relatively peaceful political period and witnessed an improved economic foundation through economic nationalism and the American System. But because of the rapid western expansion, the Americans confronted a problem of whether to expand slavery in the new territories or not. At first, this issue was solved by passing the Missouri Compromise in 1820, which attempted to balance the power between free states and slave states in the Senate. Although nationalism and the Era of Good Feelings temporarily served tension, sectionalism started to appear due to opposing views on slavery and American system and heavily contributed to the fallout of compromises.   
             During the debates on the American System, one of the first conflicts arose between the North and the South was the tariff issue. The Tariff of 1816, the first protective tariff by John Calhoun and Henry Clay, was a seed to sectionalism because New Englanders oppose the higher tariffs while Southerners supported the 1816 tariff. The Tariff of Abominations in 1828, which increased tariff to almost 50 percent, specifically angered the Southerners and caused protests. The Southerners asserted that it is unconstitutional for the Congress to impose tariffs, and thus they required nullification. Henry Clay, who was concerned about the possibility of Southern states’ secession, passed the Compromise of 1833 to pacify the Southerners.
             After those tariff controversies, sectionalism once more emerged due to the issue of slavery. Partly due to the influence of The Second Great Awakening, the idea of abolitionism widely spread among the Northerners. White abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison organized anti-slavery groups and newspapers, like Liberators and the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe in 1852 alarmed the Northerners and turned many into abolitionists. Cultural divisions regarding slavery were noticeable among the Northerners and the Southerners.
             The land gained from the Mexican War in 1848 was direct cause of the Civil War. After Americans won New Mexico and upper California through the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the compromise of 1850 again dealt with the issue of sectional balance due to the statehood of California and New Mexico. Since both applied for admission to the Union as free states, Congress decided to solve out this issue by “popular sovereignty,” which allowed residents to directly vote on the slavery issue. Also, this compromise passed new fugitive slave act, which stated that runaway slaves must be returned to the owners. This compromise was passed in five separate sections to avoid much conflicts and debates. Such difficulty shows how difficult it was to unite all opinions into one and pass a compromise.
             The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 acted as the greatest factor of sectional tensions. Western expansion allowed the United States to gain more land and, of course, more concerns about spreading slavery. When Stephen Douglas suggested forming Kansas and Nebraska, the Northerners denounced him for going against the Missouri Compromise. Though the act was passed, it was a total failure since it provoked severe sectionalism. Even violent actions such as the Bleeding Kansas and the caning of Senator Charles Sumner occurred to express the anger against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
             Lastly, the election of 1860 was highly influenced by the sectionalism over slavery issue. The Republican Party was formed after the Kansas-Nebraska Act to oppose the extension of slavery in new territories. When a series of compromises were proposed after the election, they were rejected by the Republicans or by Southerners as insufficient. Attempts to make compromises were of no use. Both sides had polarized too far.

             In the era 1820 to 1860, “Good Feelings” gradually collapsed because of increasingly different interests between the North and the South. Their economic attitudes about slaves differed, leaving a growing gap in issues of politics and economics. Making compromises became impossible for them as time passed, and collisions on sentiments over the tariffs and slavery issues finally led to the republic to Civil War in 1861.

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기